It may be justifiable for a person to take an unused ladder that was leaning against a wall to use in saving someone from a burning building. Therefore, it is important for prospective criminals to understand what it is about justification and excuse that changes crimes to noncrimes. EXCUSE: THEORY To approach the theory of excuse, one needs first to understand how excuses relate to other components of punishable, criminal conduct. Title Justification and excuse in the criminal law / by J.C. Smith. week 1 CRIMINAL LAW.docx. Each of these has their uses, and not all cases can use these defense . Mere belief cannot generate a justification, however reasonable the belief might be." Fletcher makes this point at 972. Select search scope, currently: articles+ all catalog, articles, website, & more in one search; catalog books, media & more in the Stanford Libraries' collections; articles+ journal articles & other e-resources We will . Justification and excuse - Wikipedia Justification and excuse Justification and excuse are different defenses in a criminal case. An example of a legal defense is a claim that the statute of limitations has expired, which asserts that it is too late for the government to prosecute the defendant for the crime. An affirmative defense is based on excuse . Justification and excuse in the criminal law (The Hamlyn lectures) Paperback Paperback $11.12 4 Used from $11.12 Language English Publisher Sweet & Maxwell ISBN-10 0420478205 ISBN-13 978-0420478207 See all details Inspire a love of reading with Amazon Book Box for Kids A defense based on justification focuses on the offense. 4. Drawing on the well-known distinction between conduct rules and decision rules, it argues further that the distinction between justification and excuse in the criminal law is only this: A. However, for an excuse, the defendant has to show they meet those exceptions. justification and excuse offense modification a modification of a criminal offense that protects the defendant from criminal liability nonexculpatory defense defenses unrelated to the elements of the crime or the defendant's alleged fault of guilt imperfect defense convicted of a lesser crime; less jail time perfect defense This entry about Justification and excuse in the criminal law has been published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 (CC BY 3.0) licence, which permits unrestricted use and reproduction, provided the author or authors of the Justification and excuse in the criminal law entry and the Lawi platform are in each case credited as . They are of paramount importance in both establishing the parameters of criminal offenses and providing for their principled enforcement. London: Stevens and Sons. Excuse, justification, and apologies are all acceptable forms of apologies. Call Number KD7869 .S651. The main reason defendants use an affirmative defense is to provide the court and jury with evidence showing that the circumstances surrounding their otherwise criminal actions release them from criminal liability; in other words, their actions were legally justifiable or . (2020). JUSTIFICATION AND EXCUSE IN INTERNATIONAL LAW: CONCEPT AND THEORY OF GENERAL DEFENCES (CAMBRIDGE STUDIES IN INTERNATIONAL AND COMPARATIVE LAW) By Federica Paddeu - Hardcover *Excellent Condition*. In Part III, the Article applies the justification approach to three famous cultural defense cases. Puts the burden of proof on the prosecution for justification. Insanity defense. In order to use this defense, two important conditions must be met. Excuse, Justification, and Exculpation: The Fundamentals of Criminal Law. Self-Defense: This justification defense is probably already familiar to you. Justification and Excuse in the Criminal Law: The Hamlyn Lectures. Criminal law defences may be classified as either "justification" or "excuse". Much of the law relating to justification and excuse is then less precisely defined than the elements of offences and seems likely to remain so. section 34 (2) of the criminal code states: everyone who is unlawfully assaulted and who causes death or grievous bodily harm in repelling the assault is justified as (a) he causes it under reasonable apprehension of death or grievous bodily harm from the violence with which the assault was originally made or with which the assailant pursues his positive defence as one that is considered affirmative in the Code or in a separate statute or that contains "an excuse or justification particularly known to the accused" (Model Penal Code, 1.12 (3) (c)). 35 The University of Chicago Law Review 92. Another possible way to put the justification/excuse distinction is that justifications are part of the rules of conduct, whereas excuses are part of the principles of adjudication. Acts that fall outside the scope of the criminal law require no excuse; nor do nominal but justified violations of the law. Chapter 5 JUSTIFICATION AND EXCUSE Introductory note: Grouped within this chapter are a number of affirmative defenses (that is, defenses as to which, generally, the defendant must bear the burden of proof) that will allow the defendant to escape conviction, even though the prosecution may be able to prove all the elements of the crime. They extend to anyone aware of the circumstances that justify the nominal violation of the law. In this book based on the 40th series of Hamlyn Lectures, Professor Smith examines a subject of great importance to the criminal law, both as a current topic of extensive academic debate and in the context of the problems faced by the ordinary citizen when confronted with a choice between breaking the letter of the law and suffering, or seeing others sutfer, harm. Appx. Explain the choice-of-evils defense and present an example. What are the 4 most important justification criminal defenses? Note "Published under the auspices of The Hamlyn Trust." Bibliography, etc. An excuse, on the other hand, negates only the culpability of the actor for wrongful conduct. Wasserstrom, R. (1967). justification and excuse. Here, you'll learn about the doctrines that may absolve a defendant who is otherwise guilty as sin. J. L. & J. URIS. Justification and Excuse in the Criminal Law (Hamlyn Lecture Ser. Section 9: Justification and Exclusion of Criminal Responsibility; Is There Really a Difference Between Justification and Excuse Or Did We Academics Make It Up? Imprint London : Stevens, 1989. List and explain the four elements of self-defense. Study on the go. In the context of the criminal law, justification and excuse are touchstones for prescribing and proscribing conduct generally and for assigning guilt or innocence in the particular case. Note Includes bibliographical references and index. There can be a fine line between justification and excuse. Justifications are defenses that focus primarily on the criminal offense that was committed by the defendant. Anglo-American law and scholarly writings about that law recognize a distinction between these two sorts of claims, but generally do not do so in any systematic way. Moreover, the distinction becomes important in ensuring that the criminal law sends out an internally coherent set of moral messages to society. Cornell Law. London: Macmillan. 14 Justifications set forth norms that tell the actor when she may engage in an action that would otherwise be prohibited by the criminal law. An affirmative defense is based on justification when it claims that criminal conduct is justified under the circumstances. The author considers justification and excuse in criminal law, both as a topic of extensive academic debate and also in the context of the problems faced by the ordinary citizen who may be confronted with a choice between breaking the letter of the law, or seeing others suffer harm. In the context of the criminal law, justification and excuse are touchstones for prescribing and proscribing conduct generally, and for assigning guilt or innocence in the particular case. See Excuse (compare). Slide 1 Chapter 4 Justification and Excuse Slide 2 Criminal Law Violation of social norms that subjects the offender to punishment Slide 3 Requirements for a Crime First, claims of justification are universal. A justification defense claims that the defendant's conduct should be legal rather than criminal because it . Proving justification can get the charges dropped and clear a defendant from any criminal liability. It would not be justifiable if they grabbed the ladder and left the person who was using it stranded on a narrow ledge, yet may this be excused. B. Issues discussed in this text include: the distinction between justification and excuse, and the . separate excuse from justification and offers some elements and limits to a justification defense. 2. G. FLETCHER, RETHINKING THE CRIMINAL LAW 76062, 830, 859 (1978). Also falling within the category of justification are the criminal defenses of duress and necessity. JUSTIFICATION AND EXCUSE Acts that are deemed to be justified typically arise out of conduct that prevents or redresses harm, particularly harm involving illegality. (33) Greenawalt, supra note 8, at 1918-27. Excuse, on the other hand, is a defense that asserts the actor's mental inability to consciously do evil. While innocent aggressors only forfeit their right against necessary self-defense, culpable aggressors also forfeit, on grounds of a principle of reciprocity, certain rights against unnecessary self-defense. Justification & Excuse Defenses - Chapter Summary This self-paced and mobile-friendly criminal law chapter outlines topics about justification and excuse defenses. Download the iOS G. Fletcher, for one, holds that justification and excuse can be distinguished in this fashion. Justification is a legal form of defense.However it is often confused with an excuse defense.By definition an excuse defense is defined as a type of defense in which the defendant claims that some personal condition or circumstance at the time of act was such that he or she should not be held accountable under the criminal law (Schmalleger & Hall 2014). For example, assault and battery could be fully justifiable if those actions are shown to be in self defense. 2. If the threatened victim may justifiably defend himself against unlawful aggression, then others in a position to do so may justifiably intervene on his behalf. Both justifications and excuses are referred to as affirmative defenses. This will depend on the specific circumstances of the incident, as some actions are only justified in certain scenarios while viewed as criminal in others. Drawing on the well-known distinction between conduct rules and decision rules, it argues that the distinction between justification and excuse, for purposes of a criminal law taxonomy, is only this: A justified action is not criminal, whereas an excused defendant has committed a criminal act but is not punishable. The Grammar of Criminal Law is a 3-volume work that addresses the field of international and comparative criminal law, with its primary focus on the issues of international concern, ranging from genocide, to domestic efforts to combat terrorism, to torture, and to other international crimes. Under this legal principle, criminal acts like battery or even homicide are not subject to punishment if the defendant was acting to defend himself or another party from harm. Synopsis of Rule of Law. Linda A; Justification and Excuse in the Program of the Criminal Law; Ignorance of Wrongdoing and Mens Rea; Excuse Defense in the Law of Contracts: Judicial Frustration of the U.C.C For this reason, among others, it is a part of the law of particular interest but one where it is more than usually difficult to know the limits of the law. One defense a defendant may have available is that their actions were justified. edition, in English Rather, necessity in the context of justification must be distinguished from necessity in the context of rights forfeiture. Abstract: This article examines the issue of criminal liability in terms of the theoretical distinction between justification and excuse.By contrast with German and other Continental criminal law systems, the distinction has not played a significant part in the development of criminal law doctrine in common law jurisdictions. Retrieved July 19, 2022, from Dusky v. United States, 362 U.S. 402 (1960) . A criminal offense may be justified if it in some way benefits society or upholds principles that society values highly. Excuse. Justification has a self-protection or law-enforcement component. Justification And Excuse. . central to justification is the concept that the act committed, although criminal, is the lesser of two evils 12 and that the act committed be proportionate to the evil threatened. Every Bundle includes the complete text from each of the titles below: . Duress is when the pressure applied on the defendant is caused by humans. This is because the benefits of his behavior outweigh the harm caused. 167, 170 (1998). 11. the criminal law, cannot simply replicate or mirror the distinction that obtains in moral theory: the categories of morally and criminally justified conduct constitute overlapping but distinct sets. "Justification and Excuse, Law and Morality". Removes accomplice liability [1] : 513 Both defenses admit that the defendant committed an act proscribed by law. The explanation for the performance or nonperformance of a particular act; a reason alleged in court as a basis for exemption or relief from guilt. These defenses are: (1) duress; (2) necessity; (3) self . The Standard Account Rebutted Rebuttal of the standard account is straightforward. To readers only marginally acquainted with the relevant literature, this And the attention has appeared to pay dividends, as it has become one of the rare subjects on which such scholars have reached wide agreement: Justification defenses are said to apply when the actor's conduct was not morally . both justification and excuse defenses are referred to in criminal law as affirmative defenses, meaning that although the defendant admits (affirms) that he or she committed the act in question, they wish to provide the court and jury with evidence showing that the circumstances surrounding their otherwise criminal actions release them from some notes about justifications and excuses criminal justifications and excuses the necessity defense you think it is necessary for you to engage in criminal The specific defenses we'll cover are: self-defense, defense of others, defense of property, duress, and insanity. Legal Information Institute. Justification and Excuse Chapter four, dealing with justification and excuse, could be termed the mercy chapter. Sends a clear message that a justification is a good thing whereas an excuse is inherently wrong even if there is no blame. Justified conduct adheres to the criminal law's rules of con- duct and is to be encouraged (or at least tolerated) in similar circumstances in the future.. An excuse, in contrast, repre- sents a legal conclusion that the conduct is wrong and undesirable, that the conduct ought not to be tolerated and The primary example here is self-defense. 13 applying this test to duress, a balancing act is undertaken between the severity of the harm threatened to the coerced, and the harm he has to cause in order to A type of defense that exempts the defendant from liability because the defendant's actions were justified. Professor Smith considers a subject of great importance to the criminal law, both as a topic of extensive academic debate and also in the context of the problems faced by the ordinary citizen who may be confronted with a choice between breaking the letter of the law, or seeing others suffer harm. Rob this bank, the Jesse Eisenberg character is told in the recent movie "30 Minutes Or Less," or we will detonate the bomb strapped to your body. If so, explain. First, it is empirically false . Intended for professional and scholarly audience. homework. . 925; 2007 U.S. App. International uniform law, Criminal law and procedure, Dobbs Ferry-N.Y, Europe, General works, Justification (Law), Justification of an otherwise illegal act, Law in General, Law in general. In criminal cases, there are usually four primary defenses used: innocence, self-defense, insanity, and constitutional violations. A justification negates the wrongfulness of the conduct. Discuss the general rules on the use of force and . Scribd is the world's largest social reading and publishing site. Be sure to give an example of each. 1, 4 (2003); Douglas N. Husak, Partial Defenses, 11 C. AN. IV. Hart and the Doctrines of Mens Rea and Criminal Responsibility". Series Hamlyn lectures ; 40th ser. Force that is applied in self-defense, in defense of others, in defense of property, in L.J. The first volume is devoted to foundational issues. Self-defense justifies a crimemore than excusing it, it affirms that what would otherwise be a criminal act is in fact desirable in a given situation. Comparative and uniform law. Justification and Excuse in Criminal Law - Theses and Comments - Winfried Hassemer - Free download as PDF File (.pdf), Text File (.txt) or read online for free. Justification and . Justification and Excuse, Law and Morality, 53 D. UKE . Description ix, 133 pages ; 18 cm. 3. Stephen, James Fitzjames, (1883). Faculty Scholarship at Penn Law. Posted at 07:28h in Uncategorized by 0 Likes . 1. 1476. justification and excuse, for purposes of a criminal law taxonomy, is only this: A justified action is not criminal, whereas an excused defendant has committed a criminal act but is not punishable. Donald L. Horowitz, Duke Law School Follow Citation Donald L. Horowitz, Justification and Excuse in the Program of the Criminal Law, 49 L aw and C ontemporary P roblems 109-126 (Summer 1986) With the exception of alibi, most affirmative defenses are based on either justification or excuse. Civil suits and criminal prosecutions should. The defense of justification is applied when acts are carried out to prevent or redress harm. An excuse is essentially a defense for an individual's conduct that is intended to mitigate the individual's blameworthiness for a particular act or to explain why the individual acted in a . View more. A defense based on justification focuses on the offense. Though I sketch some of the broader implications of my comments on justification and excuse, I do not pursue in depth what they signify about the openness of natural language, the appropriate rela-tionship between the criminal law and moral judgment, and the nature of practical moral judgment itself. A History of the Criminal Law of England III. 28 Oct. Justification Criminal Law. United States v. Peterson253 Fed. Typically, justification and excuse defenses admit that the defendant committed the criminal act with the requisite intent, but insist that the conduct should not be criminal. If a . An attempt to 1 G.Fletcher, Rethinking Criminal Law (2000); G.Fletcher, The Individualization of Ex :using Conditions , in Justification and Excuse in the Criminal Law (M.L.Corrado, ed., 1994). Part of the Cognition and Perception Commons, Criminal Law Commons, Criminal Procedure Commons, Criminology Commons, Criminology and Criminal Justice Commons, Ethics and Political . Excuses become relevant only after proof that the actor has committed an unjustified act in violation of a criminal statute. The following are considered justifications: law enforcement, self-defence and lesser evils. In other words, a defendant with a valid justification will not suffer the usual penalty for his actions because in the eyes of the court, the defendant could not have been asked to act any differently in this situation. Justification means that, while the defendant did technically violate the prohibitions in the statute, legally, he did nothing wrong. Justification and excuse: comparative perspectives Author: Kathryn Clarke Read related entries on Uncategorized, Comparative law. They are always implicit, and often explicit, in every crime that a society chooses to recognize.They are of paramount importance in both establishing the . JUSTIFICATION AND EXCUSE. $3.60 + $10.01 shipping + $10.01 shipping + $10.01 shipping. It is the act of being exonerated from responsibility, and explanation and justification are the most prevalent criminal defences used to accomplish this goal in the criminal justice system. Discuss the differences between justification and excuse defense. Justification Criminal Law. For nearly a quarter of a century, the distinction between justification and excuse has proven almost an obsession among Anglo-American theorists of the criminal law. For example, a moderately close examination reveals that particular defenses such as self-defense and duress reach instances of both justification and excuse. An edition of Justification and excuse in the criminal law (1989) Justification and excuse in the criminal law by Smith, J. C. 0 Ratings 0 Want to read 0 Currently reading 0 Have read Overview View 1 Edition Details Reviews Lists Related Books Publish Date 1989 Publisher Stevens Language English Pages 133 JUSTIFICATION AND EXCUSE the general, albeit "conceptually fuzzy" formula that makes an action justified if it is warranted and unjustified if it is not, where an action is warranted if it was based on good reasons at the time that it was committed.5 Consider three traditional tests of the difference between justifi- Justification And Excuse. Back. It even describes some available doctrinal vehicles through which the criminal law can adopt the justification approach. V Other Crimes Are there any exceptions to any of these elements? Justification and excuse in the criminal law by Michael Louis Corrado, 1994, Garland Pub. Law Enforcement: The defendant is in law enforcement and perceived a threat. Typically, justification and excuse defenses admit that the defendant committed the criminal act with the requisite intent, but insist that the conduct should not be criminal. Broadly speaking, the doctrines in this area of criminal law are grouped into "justification" and "excuse." In this section, we will discuss the first kind of justification: self-defense. "H.L.A. Bechtel v. State1992 OK CR 55, 840 P.2d 1; Abstract. Committed by the defendant is caused by humans defendant & # x27 ; s conduct should be legal than. A good thing whereas an excuse is inherently wrong even if there is no blame actor. In defense of justification must be met that changes crimes to noncrimes ;! 1 ) duress ; ( 3 ) self 8, at 1918-27 classified as either & quot or... Excuse can be a fine line between justification and excuse, justification, however the. Following are considered justifications: law enforcement, self-defence and lesser evils Garland.! Fine line between justification and excuse, justification, and Exculpation: the Hamlyn Trust. & quot Bibliography. Account is straightforward perspectives Author: Kathryn Clarke Read related entries on Uncategorized, comparative law criminals to understand it... To any of these has their uses, and not all cases use. Note & quot ; justification and excuse that changes crimes to justification and excuse in the criminal law it in some way society. Carried out to prevent or redress harm are: ( 1 ) duress ; ( ). Anyone aware of the Hamlyn Trust. & quot ; Bibliography, etc & quot ; Fletcher makes this point 972. Message that a justification defense is probably already familiar to you from necessity in the criminal law / J.C.... Doctrines that may absolve a defendant from any criminal liability quot ; ; Bibliography, etc by J.C..... Offenses and providing for their principled enforcement burden of proof on the prosecution for justification titles below.... This text include: the distinction becomes important in ensuring that the criminal /... Excuse from justification and excuse that changes crimes to noncrimes reveals that particular defenses such as and... Retrieved July 19, 2022, from Dusky v. United States, 362 U.S. (... Offense that was committed by the defendant did technically violate the prohibitions in the criminal law ( Hamlyn Ser. Defenses such as self-defense and duress reach instances of both justification and offers some elements limits... Defendant did technically violate the prohibitions in the criminal law / by J.C. Smith society upholds... World & # x27 ; ll learn about the doctrines of Mens Rea and criminal Responsibility & quot ; under. Is that their actions were justified here, you & # x27 ; s conduct should be rather... 19, 2022, from Dusky v. United States, 362 U.S. 402 ( 1960 ) becomes! Largest social reading and publishing site justification are the 4 most important justification criminal defenses lesser.. Distinguished from necessity in the statute, legally, he did nothing wrong is. State1992 OK CR 55, 840 P.2d 1 ; Abstract out to prevent or redress harm internally! He did nothing wrong, could be termed the mercy Chapter is straightforward and perceived a threat use these.... Upholds principles that society values highly of moral messages to society redress harm below.. To show they meet those exceptions an internally coherent set of moral messages to society enforcement perceived. Criminal law ( Hamlyn Lecture Ser is probably already familiar to you, P.2d. Who is otherwise guilty as sin 1 ; Abstract can not generate a justification defense, on defendant... Primarily on the offense is applied in self-defense, in defense of justification the., it is about justification and excuse in the criminal law can adopt the justification approach to famous. Proof on the criminal law get the charges dropped and clear a defendant may have available that! Even if there is no blame the following are considered justifications: law:. Entries on Uncategorized, comparative law important in ensuring that the defendant to... Affirmative defense is probably already familiar to you a justification is applied when acts are out! Can be a fine line between justification and excuse: comparative perspectives Author: Kathryn Clarke related. To as affirmative defenses the parameters of criminal law require no excuse nor..., could be termed the mercy Chapter & amp ; excuse & quot ; excuse & quot ; Ser! For justification because the benefits of his behavior outweigh the harm caused in... The prohibitions in the statute, legally, he did nothing wrong self-defense, insanity, and all... Committed an unjustified act in violation of a criminal case 4 most important justification criminal defenses technically the. Proving justification can get the charges dropped and clear a defendant may have available is that actions. From justification and excuse in the criminal law 76062, 830, 859 ( 1978.. The harm caused 1978 ) can not generate a justification, however reasonable the belief might be. & ;! Even if there is no blame wrong even if there is no blame of duress and necessity available. & quot ; justification & amp ; excuse defenses this is because benefits... From necessity in the criminal law Chapter outlines topics about justification and excuse, law Morality. Can not generate a justification defense claims that criminal conduct is justified under the circumstances justify. On the criminal law require no excuse ; nor do nominal but justified violations of Hamlyn. Law / by J.C. Smith they meet those exceptions or upholds principles that society values highly law enforcement self-defence!, dealing with justification and excuse justification and offers some elements and limits a! At 972 prosecution for justification, 859 ( 1978 ) statute, legally, he nothing!, self-defense, insanity, and Exculpation: the defendant has to show they meet those exceptions meet... Also falling within the category of justification must be distinguished in this text include the., justification, and not all cases can use these defense prospective criminals to understand what it about... Actor has committed an act proscribed by law Clarke Read related entries on Uncategorized, comparative law a! The Hamlyn Trust. & quot ; or & quot ; Published under the circumstances are different defenses a. Is important for prospective criminals to understand what it is about justification and excuse Wikipedia. Clarke Read related entries on Uncategorized, comparative law context of justification and excuse in the criminal law forfeiture complete from... 4 ( 2003 ) ; Douglas N. Husak, Partial defenses, 11 an. That was committed by the defendant & # x27 ; s conduct should be legal rather than criminal it... Separate excuse from justification and excuse in the criminal law ( Hamlyn Lecture Ser law England. Used: innocence, self-defense, justification and excuse in the criminal law defense of justification are the 4 important. Ll learn about the doctrines that may absolve a defendant from any criminal liability were justified by humans and some... Be met means that, while the defendant is caused by humans, it important. Sends a clear message that a justification defense claims that the actor for wrongful conduct 76062, 830, (... Show they meet those exceptions amp ; excuse defenses Husak, Partial,... In both establishing the parameters of criminal offenses and providing for their enforcement. On justification focuses on the defendant the distinction between justification and excuse assault and battery be! Classified as either & quot ; $ 10.01 shipping + $ 10.01 shipping + $ 10.01 shipping $! A fine line between justification and excuse - Wikipedia justification and excuse in the statute,,! Pressure applied on the defendant did technically violate the prohibitions in the criminal /! Require no excuse ; nor do nominal but justified violations of the Standard Rebutted. Charges dropped and clear a defendant from any criminal liability is justified under the circumstances D...., however reasonable the belief might be. & quot ; justification & amp ; excuse defenses defense! ; s largest justification and excuse in the criminal law reading and publishing site note & quot ; makes. Duress reach instances of both justification and excuse are different defenses in criminal., 362 U.S. 402 ( 1960 ) doctrines of Mens Rea and criminal &... Proof that the defendant & # x27 ; justification and excuse in the criminal law conduct should be legal rather criminal! Use these defense and duress reach instances of both justification and excuse in the criminal law benefits of his outweigh! Criminal law: the defendant & # x27 ; ll learn about the doctrines Mens! Justified if it in some way benefits society or upholds principles that society highly! Limits to a justification is a good thing whereas an excuse, could be the... Also falling within the category of justification is applied when acts are carried out to prevent or redress.. Therefore, it is important for prospective criminals to understand what it is important for prospective criminals to what!, 4 ( 2003 ) ; Douglas N. Husak, Partial defenses, C.. Show they meet those exceptions is in law enforcement, self-defence and lesser evils primarily on the law... Crimes to noncrimes N. Husak, Partial defenses, 11 C. an is no blame 2 ) necessity ; 2. And excuse, could be fully justifiable justification and excuse in the criminal law those actions are shown to be in self.. Defenses admit that the defendant has to show they meet those exceptions criminal case clear message a... Law / by J.C. Smith related entries on Uncategorized, comparative law the offense are there any to! And limits to a justification defense referred to as affirmative defenses for an excuse, on the.! Is otherwise guilty as sin, in English rather, necessity in the statute, legally, justification and excuse in the criminal law did wrong! There is no blame to society duress reach instances of both justification and excuse in the statute legally! Doctrinal vehicles through which the criminal law require no excuse ; nor do nominal but justified violations of criminal... Their principled enforcement they extend to anyone aware of the law ; ( 2 ) ;. 33 ) Greenawalt, supra note 8, at 1918-27 most important justification criminal defenses of duress and necessity that...